loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

United States Farms, 1960-1995. According to the graph, in what year were there two million farms?
Which group of living things can move energy from consumers at the top of an energy pyramid back to producers at the bottom? *
A study by goldstein and colleagues observed that women have _____, whereas men have _____.
Lenin and the Bolsheviks devoted themselves to.....
What separates the oral cavity from the nasal cavity?
Someone want to help me with some Geometry?
who was who was with Neil Armstrong on the moon
.Exe, .msi, .msp, .inf - together, what do these filetypes indicate
Which is not one of the three R's? renew reduce recycle reuse
. Which of these developments in Africa was a cause of the other three? (1) Rival tribal groups fought wars. (2) The Berlin Conference of 1884 influenced colo